|
Online Truth
|
Does Scripture Support the Concept of Self-Defense? Is Self-Defense a Right and a Duty? Is It YHWH’sDuty—Or Is It Man’s Responsibility?? Does YHWH Approveof "Christians" Protecting Themselvesand Their Families with Weapons?The majority of Christians believe that the Scripturesapprove of Self-Defense to defend one's own life, orat least the lives of one's family. Many have carriedthis farther and are now insisting it is well within“Christianity” to enter the national military and goto war to defend one’s country. With this philosophyprofessing “Christians” in one country go to war andkill other “professing Christians” who are fulfillingtheir “Christian” responsibility of protecting theircountry, and, by extension, their mates and families.Proponents often point to an incident in South Africa,where attackers charged into a church service oneSunday and began shooting and hurling grenades. Thehero of the story, a heat-packing "Christian,"returned fire with his .38 caliber pistol, killing orwounding a number of the attackers.Enthusiasts of this story look at it partly withsatisfaction that some of the attackers were "takenout" and partly with disappointment that moreworshippers were not carrying guns so more could havebeen "saved." They do not mean "saved by grace throughfaith" but by a good old-fashioned shoot-out betweenbelievers and nonbelievers.Some Christians even go so far as to declare the Scripturesa "book of war." They gleefully point to YHWH'sinstructions to the nation of Israel to destroy theidolatrous Canaanites (Numbers 33:50-53, 55), but failto recognize YHWH's original promise to Israel that Hewould drive out the inhabitants of the land if Israelwould obey Him (Exodus 23:20-30). They also point tothe commands in the Tanakh to kill lawbreakerswithin the church-state of Israel.Their basic premise is that Christians are perfectlyjustified in killing in self-defense or inanticipation of a crime. They claim society in generalwould be much safer if we had a more fully armedcitizenry. Statistics do indicate this: In a secularnation like the United States, society will be saferwith an effective deterrent against violent crime,something the government has not been and may not beable to provide without stripping citizens of manycivil liberties. The question then becomes, is this the teaching putforth in the Holy Scriptures?The question for Nazarenes--true disiples to ponder is this: Eventhough we benefit from living in a society where gunownership is a constitutional right, are we everjustified in intentionally killing another humanbeing? The sixth commandment is very clear: "You shallnot murder" (Exodus 20:13). However, what about thisseemingly gray area of killing someone to protect ourlife or property or that of the empirical self(family, church, neighbors, etc.)? So let us examine some of the arguments given by the“Christian” proponents of Self-Defense a little moreclosely. The following are the texts they often use tosupport these views: "And if anyone does not provide for his own, andespecially for those of his own household, he hasdenied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever." 1Timothy 5:8 "If a thief be found breaking in, and be smitten thathe die, there shall no blood be shed for him." Exodus22:2 "A righteous man who falters before the wicked is as amurky spring and a polluted well." Proverbs 25:26 "And I looked and rose up, and said unto the nobles,and to the rulers, and to the rest of the people, "Benot afraid of them: remember the Lord, who is greatand awesome, and fight for your brethren, your sons,and your daughters, your wives, and your houses."Nehemiah 4:14 "Then He (Yahshua) said unto them (Hisdisciples), "But now, he that has a purse, let himtake it, and likewise his bag (containing his money):and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment,and buy one. . . and they (the disciples) said, "Master,behold here are two swords.' And He (Yahshua) said untothem, "It is enough.' " Luke 22:36,38. YHWH, Himself, through Moshe, gave the followinglaw: "If men fight, and hurt a pregnant woman, so that shegives birth prematurely, he shall surely be punished,according as the woman's husband will lay upon him;and he shall pay as the judges determine. "If any harm follows, then you shall give life forlife, an eye for an eye, tooth for tooth, hand forhand, foot for foot, burning for burning, wound forwound, stripe for stripe." Exodus 21: 22-25 (Though itmust be acknowledged that this was the instructiongiven to those in the position to administerjudgment—not offended individuals themselves.) The sixth commandment says, “You do not murder:" (Exodus 20:13). Since the word "kill" used here (in other translations) in theis more accurately translated "murder,"(Thou shalt not murder), Christians, including manyChristian scholars, conclude that this commandmentdemands that there be pre-meditation and motive beforethe act of killing can be designated as "murder."Thus, it is argued, Self-Defense is EXCLUDED from thesixth commandment. Therefore, Self-Defense, it isbelieved, because of the evidence given in the othertexts listed above, is approved by YHWH. The beliefs of pacifists, it is said, do not stand upto the harsh reality of our fallen world, nor canpacifism be reconciled to the clear teachings ofScripture, according to those that promoteSelf-Defense as approved by YHWH. They quote thefollowing text to support their views: "There is a way that seems right to a man, but the endthereof is death." Proverbs 14:12 Larry Pratt, the President of Gun Owners of America,in his article, "The Biblical Principles of GunControl," apparently believes there is no problemwhatsoever for Christians to be involved inself-defense and the protection of their families. In Charl Van Wyk's book, "Shooting Back: The Right andDuty of Self-Defense," the author states: What does the Bible say about gun control? "The underlying argument for gun control seems to bethat the availability of guns causes crime. Byextension, the availability of any weapon would haveto be viewed as a cause of crime. What does the Biblesay about such a view? . . . God's [YHWH's] response (to Cain'smurder of his brother Abel) was not to ban rocks orknives, or whatever, but to banish the murderer." "Did Christ [Messiah] teach pacifism?" "Many people, Christians included, assume that Christ [Messiah]taught pacifism. They recite Matthew 5:38-39 for theirproof. In this verse Christ said: "You have heard that it was said, an eye for an eyeand a tooth for a tooth. But I tell you not to resistan evil person. But whoever slaps you on your rightcheek, turn the other to him also." The author, Charl Van Wyk, concludes that Messiah wasspeaking to the Pharisees only, the religious leadersof the day, and Messiah's message was, they say: "there is a clear distinction between the duties ofthe civil magistrate (the government) and the dutiesof an individual. Namely, God [YHWH]had delegated to thecivil magistrate the administration of justice (but)individuals have the responsibility of protectingtheir lives from attackers. . . Both the Old and NewTestament teach individual Self-Defense, even if itmeans taking the assailant's life in certaincircumstances," according to author Charl Van Wyk. Mr. Van Wyk continues: "Resisting an attack is not to be confused with takingvengeance, which is the exclusive domain of God(Romans 12:19). This has been delegated to the civilmagistrate, who, as we read in Romans 13:4,
Rom 13:4 for it is a servant of Elohim to you for good. But if you do evil, be afraid, for it does not bear the sword in vain. For it is a servant of Elohim, a revenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil. "Private vengeance means one would stalk down acriminal after one's life is no longer in danger asopposed to defending oneself during an attack. It isthis very point that has been confused by Christianpacifists who would take the passage in the Sermon onthe Mount about turning the other cheek (whichprohibits private vengeance) into a command to falterbefore the wicked. "Let us consider also, that the Sixth Commandmenttells us: "Thou shalt not murder.' In the chaptersfollowing, God [YHWH] gave to Moses many of the situationsthat require a death penalty. God [YHWH]clearly has not toldus never to kill. He has told us not to murder, whichmeans we are not to take an innocent life." (ShootingBack, by Charl Van Wyk, pgs 72,72.) Author, Charl Van Wyk, gives his explanation regardingOur Messiah's order for Peter to "put your swordaway," in John 18:10-11. Mr. Van Wyk believes that OurMessiah did NOT mean, "get rid of it forever". "That would have contradicted what He had told thedisciples only hours before. Peter's sword was toprotect his own mortal life from danger. His sword wasNOT needed to protect the Creator of the Universe andthe King of kings." (ibid. pg 75) says Mr. Van Wyk. Mr. Van Wyk concludes: "In the light of all we have seen the Scriptures teachto this point, can we argue that if we were able tosave another's life by shooting an attacker with ourfirearm—that we should "turn the other cheek' instead?The Bible speaks of no such right. It only speaks ofour responsibilities in the face of an attack—asindividual creatures made by God, as householders oras neighbours" . . . "For those who think that God treated Israeldifferently from the way He will treat us today,please consider what God told the prophet Malachi:"For I am the Lord, I do NOT change. . .' Malachi3:6." (ibid. pgs 76,77,83)Pacifism or Faith?Does it take more strength to abide by God's law andsuffer the consequences from man or to give in andlash out like the rest of mankind? Others argue thatwe have to "do our part" in taking care of ourproperty and ourselves. But where does God ever tellus that "our part" includes sinning?What it really boils down to is what a person's faithis in: God or self. Do we trust God to shield usaccording to His will after we understand the morallimits He has set on our actions?Our Creator has called us to a personal relationshipwith Him, and our trust in His nature and faithfulnesswill determine our responses and actions. A livingfaith goes far beyond lip service and demonstrateswhat we truly believe. If God is real to us, and if Heis sovereign in our lives, we will conduct ourselvesaccording to His law—even when threatened—because webelieve in His ability to accomplish His purpose andbring us into His Kingdom.Protection According to God's WillThe rewards and benefits of the Mosiac Covenant werelargely centered on physical health, material wealth,and national greatness, while its purpose was toprepare the nation for the Messiah's first coming(Galatians 3:19, 24). Salvation was available and wasattained by many as attested to in Hebrews 11. Butbecause of this emphasis on the physical, manyscriptures in the Tanach demonstrate God's intent toshield and protect Israel if they would obey. Theycould depend on their national and individualprotection if they adhered to God's Word. If theyremained faithful to the covenant, God would protectthem—it was a sure thing!We have to look at the subject of YHWH's protectionthrough the lens of His purpose. The intent of the newor renewed covenant is to develop a personalrelationship with YHWH, leading to eternal life andgodly character—and write His laws upon our hearts. Heis willing to do whatever it takes to bring us to thepoint He desires. Thus, He will sometimes remove Hisprotection when it serves His purpose.Even faithful Christians may have their housesburglarized, their cars stolen, or their propertyvandalized. They may be the victims of physical orsexual assault. They may be persecuted and evenmartyred. While some may be the recipients of violenceas a natural consequence of their actions, others willreceive it more or less undeserved, just as Messiahdid.YHWH might allow a man to suffer violence to see howHis creative work is coming along, as a potter teststo discern the quality of his clay and the design ofhis vessel. He might remove a portion of His hedge,not necessarily to punish us, but to instruct us whennothing else will get through.Under the covenant, God does not promise us completeprotection (Matthew 5:11-12, 44; 10:23; John 15:20;16:33; I Thessalonians 3:4; II Timothy 3:12; IICorinthians 11:23-28). However, we are assured that,if we fall victim to violence, it is either because ofour actions (Galatians 6:7) or because He is workingsomething out that we may not discern at the time. Ifwe are called by Him, and if we reciprocate by lovingHim, we have His sure promise that all things willwork together for good (Romans 8:28). Let us now closely examine the arguments ofself-defense proponents.The FIRST question we must ask is, "Why did Messiahcome to earth?" 1. Certainly, He came to save sinners (John 1:29) “Thenext day John sees Jesus coming to him and says,Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of theworld!” but, 2. He also came to reveal the character of The Father(Heb 1:1-4) “God, who at many times and in many waysspoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, hasin these last days spoken to us by His Son, whom Hehas appointed heir of all things, by whom also He madethe worlds, who being the shining splendor of Hisglory, and the express image of His essence, andupholding all things by the word of His power, throughHimself cleansing of our sins, He sat down on theright of the Majesty on high, being made so muchbetter than the angels, as He has by inheritanceobtained a more excellent name than they.” and 3. to be an Example for us to follow (Luke 9:23) “AndHe said to all, If anyone desires to come after Me,let him deny himself and take up his cross daily andfollow Me.” By the time Yahshua came to earth, the leaders of themost religious group on earth, those who had been"Chosen" by God to exhibit the character of God and topreach the Good News of God to all of the surroundingnations of unbelievers, had so perverted and distortedthe Word of God they had been given, turning it awayfrom a focus on God to a focus on themselves as"Special" above all men, that it was necessary for Godto come to earth in the form of man, Jesus (Yahshua),to reveal the exact and complete character of God, toshow that God was vastly different from what menbelieved about Him. But even the religious leaders were in such darkness,they did not recognize Yahshua as God (YHWH). Theywere looking for the Messiah to come in the image of"man," THEIR image of "man" - an earthly king whowould destroy their earthly enemies, the Romans, andset up the Judeans as the rulers over all othernations, an earthly kingdom, ruled by force by a"Messiah.” When Messiah refused to do this, when He refused todestroy Israel's enemies, when He refused to exhibitthe emotions of vengeance as humanity does, theJudeans refused to accept Him as their Messiah. In fact, their hearts were so severely darkened, thatthey also felt justified in killing those THEY decidedwere God's enemies. By worshiping a "killer" God, theybecame like the one they beheld, they became like theone they worshiped. (2 Cor 3:18) Therefore, in theirobsession against One who claimed to be God, theymurdered Jesus - they murdered God!Was/Is Jesus fully God - or just a partialrepresentation of God?Let's examine the texts: A)
Isaiah 7:14 Isa 7:14 “Therefore יהוה Himself gives you a sign: Look, the maiden conceives and gives birth to a Son, and shall call His Name Immanu’ĕl. B) "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with Elohim, and the Word was Elohim. "
And the Word became flesh and pitched His tent among us . . ." John 1:1, 14 C)
Heb 1:3 who being the brightness of the esteem and the exact representation of His substance, and sustaining all by the word of His power, having made a cleansing of our sins through Himself, sat down at the right hand of the Greatness on high, "Hebrews 1:1-3 D) "Philip said unto Him (Yahshua), "Master, show us theFather, and it will satisfy us:' "Yahshua said unto him, "Have I been so long time withyou, and yet have you not known Me, Philip? He thathas seen Me has seen the Father; and you say then,"Show us the Father'?" Conclusion: All of these texts document, without adoubt, that Yahshua is/was FULLY Elohim! There is NOindication that Yahshua was, in ANY way, an incompleterepresentation of Elohim! Let's examine the character that He exhibited when Hewas on earth. A. The Bible tells us that He was/is the "ExpressImage of the Father." (Heb 1:1-3) B. We are told that the He was/is to be our "Example"to follow. (Luke 9:23) Therefore, it is imperative to examine His character,which is the EXACT and COMPLETE character of TheFather because, becoming a New Creature in Messiah,means to exhibit a character IDENTICAL to thecharacter of Our Messiah. We must focus on HIM - - - and NOT on human beings! We must focus on HIM - - - and NOT on the example offaithless Israel! Religious leaders of "Israel" eventually became socorrupt and so wicked that they crucified Messiah,they eventually murdered their Deliverer, the very Onewho had delivered Israel from slavery in Egypt! Where and how did Israel go so wrong? Israel began wandering far from YHWH immediately aftertheir exodus from Egypt. When the Israelites left Egypt, they had NO weapons.They left with only their families, their possessions,their flocks, and "articles of silver and articles ofgold, and garments" (Exodus 12:35) - silver and goldjewelry plus expensive yardage (material) - the thingsthat were later used to build the tabernacle of theLord in the wilderness. YHWH had shared His "game-plan" with Moses for thedeliverance of the Israelites. In Exodus 3:2-8, YHWHtalked to Moses through the burning bush: "And YHWH said, "I have surely seen the afflictionof My people that are in Egypt, and I have heard theircry by reason of their taskmasters; for I know theirpain. "And I am come down to deliver them out of the hand ofthe Egyptians, and to bring them up out of that landinto a good land and a large, unto a land flowing withmilk and honey. . . Exodus 3:7,8 YHWH said, "I am come down to deliver them. . ." YHWHwas going to deliver them. He did NOT need any helpfrom the Israelites. YHWH was showing the Israelitesand ALL believers since then - up to and including thepresent time - that HE is solely responsible for ourdeliverance from sin (symbolized by Egypt). We have NOpart in our deliverance. It is ALL of YHWh - andNOTHING of us! YHWH does the fighting - NOT man! HE does the fightingin His OWN way - NOT in man's way! HE is ALONEresponsible for our deliverance! THIS principle is the FOUNDATION of the completeanswer to the question: Does YHWH Approve ofSelf-Defense? YHWH's answer is that HE ALONE is responsible for ourdeliverance from both physical and spiritual danger! When Pharaoh pursued the Israelites, they seemedtrapped between a mountain on one side and the Red Seain front of them. The Israelites cried out to Moses, "Didn't we tell you in Egypt, "Let us alone, that wemay continue to be slaves to the Egyptians? For itwould have been better for us to be slaves to theEgyptians, than to die here in the wilderness." Exodus14:12 "And Moses said unto the people: "Fear not. Stand still, and see the deliverance of theLord, which He will show to you today. For theEgyptians whom you have seen today, you shall see themagain no more forever. "YHWH SHALL FIGHT FOR YOU, and YOU SHALL BEQUIET!"Exodus 14:13HERE IS YHWH'S PLAN: “YHWH SHALL FIGHT FOR YOU, and YOU shall bequiet!"THIS is where we must begin, in order to see what HISwill is about "Self-Defense." YHWH's Answer is: "YHWH shall fight for you, andYOU shall be quiet!"After HE delivered the Israelites from the Egyptiansby parting the waters of the Red Sea, after theirenemies, Pharaoh and the Egyptians were ALL drowned,the Israelites:Exo 14:31 And Yisra’ĕl saw the great work which יהוה had done in Mitsrayim, and the peoplefeared יהוה, and believed יהוה and His servant Mosheh. Then the Israelites rejoiced and praised YHWH.(Exodus 15:1-21) But the faith of the Israelites was very superficialand very short-lived. They immediately began murmuringagainst Moses when they were thirsty - and hungry, andcould not find water - nor food. YHWH had told them HEwould be their Deliverer, HE would do the fighting forthem, HE would provide for them. Many are familiar with the passage in Jeremiah31:31-34 which mentions a new or renewed covenant. This passage is quoted in Hebrews 8:8-12. Pleasenotice Jeremiah 31:32 “not according to the covenantthat I cut with their fathers in the day I took themby the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt;which covenant of Mine they broke, although I was ahusband to them, says YHWH;” YHWH here again declares that He was a husband untothem. Those who understand the role of husband knowthat a husband agrees to guide, protect, and providefor His bride. That is the relationship Israel had. And that is the relationship those who are truly the“Bride of Messiah” have. He will be guide, protector,and provider.But the Israelites constantly turned to Moses - theyconstantly turned to MAN - and NOT to the Almighty!They put their trust in MAN - and NOT YHWH! (Exodus,Chapters 15 and 16) An Enemy Nation Attacks Israel: Then, the Amalekites, an enemy of Israel, came tofight with Israel in Rephidim. "And Moses said unto Joshua, "Choose us out men, andgo out, fight with Amalek. . So Joshua did as MOSEShad said to him, and fought with Amalek. . . AndJoshua defeated Amalek and his people with the edge ofthe sword." Exodus 17:9,10,13 It is VERY important to notice several things in thispassage: 1. When the enemy Amalekites were coming against theIsraelites, there is NO record that Moses consultedwith YHWH about how to handle the situation. Moses,himself, made the decision on what to do: "Moses saidunto Joshua. . ." 2. Joshua did not consult the Eternal, either. Joshuadid what MOSES told him to do. 3. The Israelites had, somewhere along the way,obtained weapons to defeat the Amalekites "with theedge of the sword." The logical conclusion as to where the Israelitesobtained their weapons (as they had NO weapons whenthey left Egypt), was from the weapons that floatedashore after Pharaoh and the Egyptians were drowned inthe Red Sea. This means that, even though YHWH had miraculouslydelivered the Israelites from the Egyptians by openingthe Red Sea, the Israelites still did not trust HIM. Undoubtedly, they believed that a coincidence ofnature caused a mighty wind to blow, and thus thewaters of the Red Sea were parted. They completelyfailed to see YHWH's hand in it. Instead theyimmediately took up arms to take control of their ownfate - to DEFEND themselves - to PRACTICESELF-DEFENSE! Instead of leaving their defense toYHWH, the Almighty. Did the Israelites chose to put their trust in "MAN" -in Moses and Joshua and in themselves and theirweapons - instead of trusting in YHWH to defend them? This was to Israel a GREAT TURNING POINT - - - AWAYfrom YHWH! Over the next many centuries, up to and including thetime of Messiah, Israel continued to grow farther andfarther from YHWH. The Character of YHWH Now, let's look at the character of YHWH, in light ofthe fact that Israel had rejected His protection andtaken their defense into their own hands. YHWH could have walked away and left them to their owndevices, to fend completely for themselves. But Hechose not to do that. Even though the Israelites had chosen to fight forthemselves, He did not leave them. He knew that theIsraelites' decision would bring them much harm,disappointment and loss of life, compared to Hisoriginal Perfect plan of deliverance for them, byHimself ALONE. But He still remained with theIsraelites helping them to minimize the disasters theywould bring upon themselves by their own foolishdecisions. He was still their husband. Because He remained with the Israelites as they foughttheir wars - rather than totally abandoning them, Hehas been falsely accused of endorsing: 1) war, 2) theuse of weapons in self-defense, and 3) the destructionof the humanly-declared enemies of Our Messiah and thehumanly-declared enemies of His true disciples. It was THIS DECISION by the Israelites, the decisionto take up arms against the very first enemy theyconfronted after their deliverance from Egypt, thedecision to defend themselves rather than letting YHWHdefend them, the decision to put their trust in man -in themselves - rather than to put their trust in HIM,that eventually led the Israelites --many centurieslater to crucify Our Messiah! Their initial decision to run their OWN lives, ratherthan to let YHWH run their lives, allowed their heartsand the hearts of their progeny, to become soprogressively darkened that they could no longerdiscern right from wrong, they could no longer discerntruth from error, they could not discern YHWH in theform of Yahushua, even when He was standing right infront of them. Instead, they accused Him of being controlled by Satan("Beelzebub" - Luke 11:15), and they cried out,"Crucify Him; crucify Him!" And they murdered Our Messiah! YHWH gave the early Israelites another chance! YHWH gave the early Israelites another chance to letHim be their deliverer, rather than the Israelitespracticing Self-Defense. After He had told Moses toask the Israelites to come to the foot of Mt. Sinai soHe could talk to the people directly (Ex 19:9), thepeople became frightened and refused to have directcommunion with Him. They wanted Moses to talk to Himdirectly, and then Moses could tell them what He said.(Ex 20:18-21) They wanted MAN as an intermediarybetween YHWH and themselves. It was only AFTER the Israelites made their OWNdecision NOT to talk to YHWH directly that YHWH set upthe entire system of civil laws for man to rule overman, and the entire religious sanctuary system wherepriests were ordained to be the intermediary betweenman and YHWH. This whole system, both civil andreligious, was set up by YHWH IN RESPONSE to theIsraelites desire NOT to talk to YHWH directly. This was NOT HIS idea. This was MAN'S idea! Even after all this, YHWH still planned to bring theIsraelites into the Promised Land WITHOUT bloodshed,WITHOUT the Israelites' weapons of war. His Plan STILLwas to deliver the Israelites into the Promised Landby HIS might ALONE, as He said in Exodus 23:28: "I will send hornets before thee, which shall driveout the Hivite, the Canaanite, and the Hittite, frombefore thee. "I will not drive them out from before thee in oneyear; lest the land become desolate, and the beast ofthe field multiply against thee. "Little by little, I will drive them out from beforethee, until thou be increased, and inherit the land." His Plan was to drive the inhabitants of the land outwith hornets. He would do it ALONE! NO ONE would bekilled or hurt, neither the Israelites, nor theinhabitants of Canaan. After all, the Hivites, theCannanites, and the Hittites were His children aswell. Even though they were not worshiping Him at thattime, YHWH still loved them. But, for the rest of their time in the wilderness, andtheir conquest of the land of Canaan, the Israeliteswere totally committed to battling for themselves. Ohyes, they asked Him to be with them as theyslaughtered others and were slaughtered themselves.They were willing to take His advice, at times, butONLY when it agreed with THEIR general plan of"Conquest by War and Weaponry." The Israelites had chosen to do things THEIR way,rather than YHWH's way. But even then, He did notleave them entirely alone. He helped them when theyasked for His advice regarding the plans THEY hadmade. Because of this, YHWH has been accused ofENDORSING their plans. But He did not. Instead, He metthem where they were and worked with them to minimizethe damage they would bring on themselves.Hence, the need for a covenant with the laws writtenin the hearts and minds of mankind. Here is a human illustration of how YHWH interactswith us when we make our OWN plans, instead offollowing His way: There is the story of a man named Joe who was againsthunting and killing animals for sport. All of hisfriends were hunters, and repeatedly they asked him togo hunting with them. He always refused. Theyrespected him but would taunt him now and then abouthis distaste for killing animals. The man tried to instill in his son the same respectfor animal life and never allowed his son to gohunting when the son's friends invited him. Years passed and the son grew up to the age where hecould make his own decisions. He then decided hewanted to go hunting with his friends. The young man'sfather was heart-sick that his training had notconvinced the son of the wrong he was doing, but theson persisted in his determination to be a hunter. Because the son was old enough to decide for himself,and the son had made the choice to be a hunter, thefather had two options: 1) to let his son go huntingwith only the knowledge that he could pick up fromother hunters, or 2) to teach his son how to handle agun safely so he wouldn't injure or kill himself orothers and to teach his son how to shoot so the animalwould be killed quickly and mercifully and not die asuffering death. The father chose the second option. So he took his sonto a shooting range and was in the process of teachinghis son how to handle a gun safely and how to shoot ontarget, when who should appear but the man's oldfriends who had repeatedly asked the man to join themfor hunting. As the friends stood afar off and watched the fatherand son, they decided (wrongly) that Joe had changedhis mind about hunting and now endorsed it. After all,it was obvious that he was teaching his own son how toshoot. They saw it with their own eyes. But of course, the friends of Joe were VERY WRONG! Joewas still VERY MUCH AGAINST hunting. He had justdecided to "meet his son where he was" and make thebest of his son's bad decision. Joe's friends had judged Joe wrongly! The whole world has judged YHWH wrongly in the sameway. YHWH NEVER intended that the Israelites take uparms to defend themselves. He repeatedly told themthat HE would defend them, HE would fight theirenemies, but NOT with physical warfare. But when they refused to follow His ways and insistedon following their OWN ways by fighting their enemieswith weapons, He still did not leave them. They were,as we are, His children, and He helped them as much asHe could, even with the disastrous plans they hadchosen for themselves. After all, He had chosen them,and was fulfilling His word to their faithful father,Abraham. But because of His kind and loving attitudes towardHis errant, rebellious children, He has been accusedof endorsing the perverse plans of the Israelites. HIS original Plan was for their deliverance from Egyptby HIM - and HIM ALONE! So, we CANNOT use as our example, how Israelfunctioned AFTER they chose to reject His way. We mustfocus on God's Initial Perfect Plan for Israel'sdeliverance. He DID NOT endorse - NOR approve of – theirSelf-Defense! It was NEVER His way! We must look at YHWH'S ways - and NOT at Israel'srebellious ways!We must look at the life of Yahshua Our Messiah! Suspension of the Law?If, as some assert, it is justifiable to break thesixth commandment to protect oneself or one'sinterests, is it also permissible to break any of theother commandments when threatened? Consider the samequestion of defense, but substitute any of YHWH'scommands for the sixth commandment:» First Commandment: Could we have another god beforethe true God if it meant protection for our familiesand properties? For instance, would God look kindlyupon us accepting Allah in order to stay alive?» Second Commandment: Can we fall back on idol worshipif it will keep us alive? Aaron built the Golden Calffor the Israelites because he feared them more thanGod (Exodus 32:1-9)—and YHWH was very displeased!» Third Commandment: Can we take on YHWH's name, onlyto renounce it when trouble comes? Could we diminishthe quality of our worship of YHWH if it meant safetyand security? Would YHWH be pleased if we ignored Histrue nature—His character, mind, plans, will,promises—in hope of putting ourselves in a betterposition?» Fourth Commandment: The seventh-day Sabbath is aweekly reminder of some of YHWH's attributes, as wellas a unique sign and everlasting covenant between Himand His people (Exodus 31:12-17). It plays a crucialpart in our relationship with YHWH. Would He everapprove our renouncing the Sabbath to keep from harm?Imperial and Papal Rome martyred many Christiansbecause they held this part of God's law as inviolate.» Fifth Commandment: A current cultural trend isdisrespect toward parents by both adolescent and grownchildren. However, in Deuteronomy 27:16, YHWHpronounces a death sentence on children who treattheir parents with contempt. Likewise, He wouldcondemn a person who broke this commandment to savehis skin.» Seventh Commandment: The spiritual principle behindadultery and fornication is faithlessness to anagreement, covenant, or contract. YHWH accuses Israelof harlotry because they were unfaithful to theircovenant with Him. Even though it is highly unlikelythat we would ever be "asked" to commit sexualimmorality to save our lives, could we break anagreement or contract to protect our lives orproperties? Would YHWH wink at our breaking our eternalcovenant with Him—sealed with His Son's blood—in theinterest of self-preservation?» Eighth Commandment: The psalmist writes that, in allof his life, he has "not seen the righteous forsaken,nor his descendants begging bread" (Psalm 37:25). Wewould not be justified in stealing food—or anythingelse—to preserve life when God shows repeatedly in HisWord that He will provide for the righteous (Matthew6:25, 33).» Ninth Commandment: It is extremely easy to lie tosave oneself or one's family. Anyone up against a wallwith a gun to his head would be tempted to tell a"little white lie" to stay alive. Under the perceivedthreat of death because of Sarah's beauty, Abrahamtold a "half-truth" to Abimelech. YHWH did not acceptthis behavior from the "father of the faithful." WouldHe be pleased with us in any similar situation?» Tenth Commandment: In its wider application, thecommand against coveting deals with the root of one'ssin against his neighbor: attitudes, desires, andsecret thoughts. If our "neighbor" is robbing orthreatening us, would God hold us guiltless for"coveting" our neighbor's life—desiring that his lifebe taken—if God has not ordained it?It is evident that YHWH does not allow us to suspendHis inexorable law if our life is threatened. Humannature, though, insists on a "self clause." Humannature tells us that YHWH's law is fine unless it goescontrary to what we perceive as our best interests.Sovereignty and SubmissionAt the core of this question, as with our entire"Christian" walk, is government—not the government of anation but the issue of whom we will allow to governus. In this instance, either we can govern ourselvesby "deciding" when it is permissible to kill, or wecan submit to YHWH's benevolent authority and Hisexplanation of morality. In the final analysis, we arenot allowed to determine what is right and wrong—YHWHhas already done this. Our only decision is if we willact in accordance with YHWH's law!Each of the nine examples above arrays the"all-important" self against YHWH and His royallaw—polar opposites. What we decide demonstrates whatwe hold in the higher regard, that is, what weworship. For example, if we intentionally take anotherman's life in defense of our own, are we worshippingthe self rather than YHWH?Romans 8:7 describes this power struggle perfectly:"Because the carnal mind is enmity against YHWH; for itis not subject to the law of YHWH, nor indeed can be."Human nature puts its own cares and interests aboveYHWH, and the result is that the carnal man will notsubmit himself to YHWH's clear commands. The carnal manwill be willing to harm, even kill, another createdhuman being to protect his own interests, in spite ofYHWH's law and Messiah’s striking example to thecontrary. Judge, Jury, and ExecutionerTo further illustrate how prominent the self is inthis, in taking another man's life, one is acting ashis judge, jury, and executioner. This, then, alsoinvolves the sin of presumptuousness. Of these threeroles, the only authority YHWH has given us is tojudge. He commands us to judge—to consider a matter inthe light of His definition of right and wrong—but itis not our place to decide a sentence or to carry itout. To do so presumes authority not granted to us.As we saw earlier, the self-defense scenario does nothold up when considered in light of the other ninecommandments. We can undertake a similar exercise interms of one acting as judge, jury, and executioner.What other scenarios could we imagine that wouldjustify killing another person in response to or inanticipation of a sin? Should we emulate the radicalfollowers of Islam and kill anyone who does notconvert to "Christianity"? Should we shoot someonebecause he has an idol in his house? Can we murder aman because we overheard him telling a lie or stone awoman taken in adultery?These examples are absurd because YHWH says every sinrequires the death penalty (Romans 6:23). Not a singleperson would be alive if God responded to sin ascarnal man wants to respond to sins that directlyaffect him. Also, consider that, in the scenario ofkilling in self-defense, the one killing is judgingthat his life is more important than the life he iswilling to snuff out. One sinner accounts his life tobe of more worth than the life of another sinner.Would God make the same determination? The Other Side: Now, let's closely examine the aforementioned textsthat are used to support the claim that YHWH's Wordendorses Self-Defense: 1. "And if anyone does not provide for his own, andespecially for those of his own household, he hasdenied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever." 1 Timothy 5:8 When this text is read in context, it has nothing todo with protection of one's family from attackers orintruders. The passage, instead, pertains to providingfor the elderly women and widows in one's family,rather than putting that burden on the church. 2. "If a thief be found breaking in, and be smittenthat he die, there shall no blood be shed for him."Exodus 22:2 Let's look again at the chronology of that directive. In Exodus 19:10,11, YHWH told Moses to direct theIsraelites to come to the foot of Mt. Sinai so Hecould talk to them directly. He gave the Ten Commandments to the people in Exodus20:1-17. YHWH's intention at Sinai was to put the LAWinto the hearts of the Israelites, so they would havea new heart, and do right because it is right - NOTjust because there was a law written on stone. But inverses 18-22, we find that the people were terrifiedof Him and refused to allow Him to talk to themdirectly. They told Moses to talk to Him, then Mosescould tell them what HE said. They were afraid theywould die if YHWH talked to them directly. Therefore, since the Israelites refused to allow Godto have personal interaction with each one of themdirectly, it was impossible for God to put the Law intheir hearts. Instead, YHWH wrote the law on tabletsof stone - a physical presence of the law - ratherthan a spiritual law written on their hearts. It was only after the Israelites refused to allow Godto put the law in their hearts (which would have madea human justice system unnecessary), that YHWH set up asystem where man would rule over man. Only then didGod give penalties for thieves, murderers and thoseguilty of man-slaughter. This was NOT in YHWH's initial plan. In addition, YHWH gave them additional laws of conductin Exodus 21:24,25: "Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot forfoot, burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe forstripe." These laws were given in Exodus 21, AFTER YHWH gave theTen Commandments (in Exodus 20) and the people refusedto be in direct contact with YHH, they refused toallow Him to be there Leader and Ruler. They wanted tobe led by "Man," to get their orders from Moses, notYHWH. So YHWH gave them what they desired, a plan so mancould rule over man in place of Himself. In thatsituation, He set down rules to limit theirruthlessness. He told them, "if someone puts outanother's eye, the victim CANNOT respond in ANY waythat is more vicious than what was done to him." (Again, please be aware that these were instructionsthat were to be administered through the judges (v.22), those who had the responsibility to administerjudgment.) YHWH's InstructionThe children of Israel, before they demanded a king inI Samuel 8:5-8, were both a nation and a religiouscongregation. The human government that YHWH ordainedover Israel had both civil and religious authority. Assuch, many of Israel's civil laws given by God throughMoses are not directly applicable today because we donot live in a church-state with YHWH at the helm anddirectly bearing on the judicial process. Nonetheless,these laws still show YHWH's intent and will concerningcivil matters—in the situation brought about byrejecting His direct government.YHWH instructed Israel about what to do when a man waskilled. Numbers 35:9-28 shows that YHWH recognizes onlytwo classifications of killing: accidental andintentional. "Self-defense" is not even listed as apossibility! YHWH illustrates "accidental death" asoccurring when there is no intent to kill or to harm.It is accidental when there is no awareness that anaction will result in the death of another.Deuteronomy 19:5 provides a clear example of such anaccident: ". . . as when a man goes to the woods withhis neighbor to cut timber, and his hand swings astroke with the ax to cut down the tree, and the headslips from the handle and strikes his neighbor so thathe dies."However, when there is intent to kill or injure, YHWH'slaw defines it as murder regardless of what the otherperson was threatening to do, about to do, or in theprocess of doing. If a man fires a gun with theforeknowledge that it has the potential to killanother man, it is murder. The "self-defense" categoryis something afforded by the law of the land, not bythe law of YHWH. But this was NOT YHWH's ideal. That's why Our Messiahsaid, in Matt 5:38: "You have heard that it has been said, "An eye for aneye, and a tooth for a tooth; "But I say unto you, That you resist NOT an evilperson; but whosoever shall smite you on your rightcheek, turn to him the other also." (Of course, thisshould not be taken as a command not to flee or avoidphysical abuse.) He was telling them that now that He had come to savethe world, the old way of doing things was no longernecessary or valid. The Holy Spirit would now beavailable for all—and His Law is written in our heartsand minds. The system of priests and sacrifices wouldbe done away with, and there would be directcommunication between the people and YHWH. He willrule man directly, through His Spirit being in theirhearts. Therefore, they would exhibit the VERY SAMECHARACTER that Messiah exhibited when He was on earth. 3. "A righteous man who falters before the wicked is amurky spring and a polluted well." Proverbs 25:26 There are many texts in Proverbs that instruct therighteous against being influenced by the wicked, suchas: 4. "He that walketh with wise men shall be wise: but acompanion of fools shall be destroyed." Proverbs 13:20 There is nothing to suggest that Proverbs 25:26 refersto taking the life of a wicked man. That would becontrary to everything else in the Scriptures. It ismuch more likely that it is referring to standing fortruth against the pressure from wicked peers. Yahshuasaid, "He that denieth Me before men shall be deniedbefore the angels of Elohim." Luke 12:9 5. "And I looked and rose up, and said unto thenobles, and to the rulers, and to the rest of thepeople, "Be not afraid of them: remember YHWH, whois great and awesome, and fight for your brethren,your sons, and your daughters, your wives, and yourhouses." Nehemiah 4:14 One of the factors on which they were exhorted tobravery was to remember all that YHWH had done for Hispeople—all the times He had protected them in thepast. Let us not forget that this passage, written by theprophet Nehemiah in about 430 B.C., was writtenapproximately 1,000 years AFTER the Exodus, 500 yearsafter King David's rule, 450 years after the kingdomsof Israel and Judah were divided, and about 200 yearsafter the Israelites had been exiled to Babylon, the"model" nation for wickedness! Even though Nehemiah was a prophet of YHWH, the idea ofwarfare was so ingrained in the people of Israel, thatpure trust in YHWH for their safety was almostunthinkable to the average person. Nehemiah chose tobe armed and have his fellow temple builders armed. Again, there are no instructions from YHWH for him toarm the people. Certainly since this effort was HISwill, He would have protected them whether or not theyarmed themselves. So this passage does not state asto whether YHWH approved of this action or not. Also, history records that no attacks were made onthem. It was not His will that they be attacked. 6. "Then He (Yahshua) said unto them (His disciples),"But now, he that has a purse, let him take it, andlikewise his bag (containing his money): and he thathas no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. .. and they (the disciples) said, "Master, behold hereare two swords.' And He (Yahshua) said unto them, "It isenough." Luke 22:36,38 Over and over again, in the Messianic Scriptures, theword "sword" is used figuratively, meaning "truth."Yahshua said, "I came not to send peace, but a sword." Matt 10:34 ". . .the sword of the Spirit which is the Word ofElohim. "Eph 6:17 "And to the angel of the church in Pergamos write;These things saith He which hath the sharp sword with two edges. . ." Rev 2:12 "And out of His mouth goeth a sharp sword, that withit He should strike the nations." Revelation 19:15 In these instances, the word "sword" is usedfiguratively symbolizing "truth" or "the Word of Elohim."Is it not reasonable to conclude that Messiah's use ofthe word "sword" in Luke 22:36, is also figurative andnot literal? In addition, Messiah used the words "garment" or"garments" ten times in the New Testament: Matt 9:16(twice), Matt 22:11, Matt 22:12, Matt 23:5, Mark 2:21,Mark 13:16, Luke 5:36, Luke 22:36, Rev. 3:4. In virtually every instance, the words "garment" or"garments" were used figuratively, NOT literally, suchas: 1) the wedding "garment" of righteousness, 2) aparable of putting a new "patch" and an old "garment"compared similarly to putting new wine into oldwineskins, 3) symbolizing the Pharisee's obsession forthe adulation of the people, 4) "garment" symbolizedpossessions (Mark 13:16). It is reasonable to conclude that here in Luke 22:36,the usage by Our Messiah of the word "garment" is alsofigurative, and not literal. If Luke 22:36 were to be taken literally, Messiahwould be telling his disciples to sell their literalclothes and buy literal swords. During His time,people didn't have closets full of clothes, nor didthey travel with luggage. Most of them only had onegarment that they washed and wore over and over again.If they sold their one garment to buy a sword, theywould be traveling naked! In addition, when the disciples responded to Messiah'sdirective, which the disciples all took literally,they said, "Lord, behold here are two swords. AndMessiah said unto them, "It is enough." This was also a fulfillment of prophecy. He was to benumbered with the lawless ones, (v.37), and for thisreason, the two swords sufficed. Obviously, two literal swords are grossly inadequateto defend twelve men who are being physicallyattacked. Messiah said, "It is enough," because Herealized all too clearly that they didn't understandwhat He was trying to tell them. So, in this instance,as in many before and after this, He just let it drop. What Our Messiah was trying to tell the disciples wasto get rid of their "garments" of unrighteousness and,instead, replace them with the "sword" of Elohim's Word,the "sword" of truth. But the disciples were clueless. They had no idea whatMessiah meant. So, some would conclude that none of these texts,frequently quoted by supporters of self-defense, standup to scrutiny. They, in fact, do NOT supportSelf-Defense in the sense of taking another’s life ordoing physical harm! We have looked at "Israel," at "man's" way of doingthings - - - now let's Look at the Life of Messiah! We are told that Yahshua is our Example: (Luke 9:23) We are told that by beholding Yahshua, we will bechanged into His image: (2 Cor 3:18) We are told that "the ONLY name among men by which weMUST be saved - is the name of Jesus!" (Acts 4:12) We are told to follow Yahushua. Live life as He livedit - doing ONLY the will of His Father - OUR Father! Therefore, we must look at the life of Yahusha - andtake our eyes OFF of Israel. The Life of Our Messiah: Was there EVER a time when Messiah was on earth thatHe hurt or killed ANYONE – in self-defense? Was there EVER a time when He defended Himself orothers with physical force? Often the story of Yahshua's cleansing of the temple isused as support for the idea of striking back atothers. But read the story carefully. Yahshua NEVER killed, oreven hurt, anybody. Yahshua, at no time appearedfrightening. The Bible gives us the evidence: "And the Passover was at hand, and Yahshua went up toJerusalem, and found in the temple those that soldoxen and sheep and doves and the moneychangerssitting: "And when He had made a whip of small cords, he drovethem all out of the temple, and the sheep, and theoxen: and poured out the changers' money, andoverturned the tables; "And said unto them that sold doves, "Take thesethings hence; make not My Father's house an house ofmerchandise . . . "And the blind and the lame came to Him in the temple;and He healed them." John 2:13-16, Matt 21:14 Immediately after the moneychangers and the animalsleft, sick people flocked to Yahshua for healing. Sickpeople do NOT flock to a person who appearsfrightening. Obviously Yahshua did not scare them. They willinglycame to Him, asking Him to heal them. How Did Yahshua Treat the Common People? Look at the way Our Messiah treated Judas at the LastSupper. Even after He knew that Judas had betrayed Himto His death, He knelt and washed Judas' feet. After Messiah was arrested, Peter denied Him threetimes. He looked at Peter with sadness, not anger. When Yahshua was arrested, falsely accused, mocked,ridiculed, stripped naked, beaten and crucified, HeNEVER fought back. He NEVER made ANY move to saveHimself. His response was, "Father, forgive them, theydon't understand what they're doing." (It was all inaccordance with the Father’s will.) Our Messiah came to earth to be an example for us(Luke 9:23), to show us how to live, to reveal to usthat He came to do: ". . not My own will, but the will ofHim who sent Me." (John 6:38)We are to follow His example. We are to put our fulltrust in YHWH, knowing that He is Sovereign, that"ALL is OF Him, TO Him and THROUGH Him" (Rom 11:36). God is in TOTAL control of everything. Satan cannot doanything unless YHWH allows it. (See Job, Chapters 1 &2). And He says that: "God worketh ALL things after the counsel of HIS OWNWILL." Eph 1:11 In the Tanach, it was clearly YHWH's Plan that theIsraelites were NOT to fight physically. YHWH was goingto "fight" for them, instead. But YHWH's "fighting" isvery different from man's warfare. YHWH was going to"fight" by opening the Red Sea, by driving out theCanaanites with hornets, etc. In the Messianic Scriptures, Messiah, by the exampleof His entire, perfect life, showed us that He did notresort to Self-Defense. In Ephesians 6:10-17 we aretold: "Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Master and inthe power of His might. "Put on the whole armor of Elohim, that you may be ableto STAND against the schemes of the devil. . . "Stand therefore, having girded your waist with TRUTH,and having on the breastplate of righteousness; "And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospelof peace; "And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword ofthe Spirit, which is the Word of Elohim. "Wherefore take up the whole armor of Elohim, that youmay be able to withstand in the evil day, and havingdone all, to STAND." The armor of Elohim that we are instructed to wear isSpiritual armor, NOT physical armor. And we are toSTAND, NOT fight! YHWH does the fighting for us becauseour enemy is spiritual and not physical, even if itappears physical, and we are incapable of fighting thebattle ourselves. "For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, butagainst principalities, against powers, against therulers of the darkness of this world, againstspiritual wickedness in the heavenly places." Eph 6:12 "He that taketh not his cross, and followeth after Me,is not worthy of Me. He that findeth his life shalllose it; and he that loseth his life for My sake shallfind it." (Matt 10:39) When we deliver ourselves from danger by the use ofdeadly force, we rob YHWH of His glory by robbing Himof His plans for us, whether to save us miraculouslyor allow us to die like He did. Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego said, "Our Elah CAN saveus from the burning fiery furnace, but even if Hedoesn't, we will NOT bow down to gods and images."(Dan 3:17,18) "Fear not them which kill the body, but are not ableto kill the soul. . ." Matt 10:28 "They shall put you out of the synagogues; yea, thetime cometh, that whosoever killeth you will thinkthat he doeth Elohim service." John 16:2 "If the worldhate you, you know that it hated Me before it hatedyou. "If you were of the world, the world would love hisown, but because you are not of the world, but I havechosen you out of the world, therefore the worldhateth you. "Remember the word that I said unto you, "The servantis not greater than his Lord. If they have persecutedMe, they will also persecute you." John 15:18-20 Some say, "Well, I will certainly be willing to diefor the Lord or His Word, but I'm not willing to diebecause a burglar breaks into my house." But it's ALL about trusting YHWH. "For Elohim has not given us a spirit of fear; but ofpower, and of LOVE, and of a sound mind. 2 Timothy 1:7 "Fear not, for I am with you. Be not dismayed for I amyour Elohim. I will strengthen you; I will help you; Iwill uphold you with my right hand of righteousness.Isaiah 41:10 "YHWH is my light and my salvation; whom shall Ifear? YHWH is the strength of my life; of whomshall I be afraid? Psalm 27:1 "I will say of YHWH, He is my refuge and myfortress; my Elohim; in Him will I trust. Psalm 91:2 "God is our refuge and strength, a very present helpin trouble. Psalm 46:1 "The Lord is my shepherd. I shall not want.. . .Though I walk through the valley of the shadow ofdeath, I will fear no evil for you are with me. Psalm23:1,4 We must put our entire trust in the Lord. Well, does that mean I should leave my doors unlocked?Is it a sin to have a security system? Of course not! We should lock our doors, and asecurity system is prudent if one can afford it. Weare told NOT to be presumptuous. Messiah was tempted,by Satan, to jump from the pinnacle of the temple.Satan claimed that the angels would catch Messiah,"lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone."(Matt 4:5,6) But Messiah responded, "It is written, "Thou shalt NOTtempt (test) the Lord thy God." Matt 4:7 In otherwords, we are NOT to be presumptuous. We are to do thereasonable things for our protection, but do nothingthat can harm someone significantly or take a life. What if one sees kidnapers kidnapping a child? Is onesupposed to just stand there and let it happen? Orjust stand there and pray? Prayer is appropriate at anytime, even while you aretackling the kidnapper. But "tackling" is NOT deadlyforce. What if an intruder comes in to rape a man's wife?What if a burglar comes in and puts a gun to yourchild's head? Doesn't a father and husband have aright and an obligation to protect his wife andchildren, even to the point of taking the life of theburglar or rapist? The Bible explicitly tells us that, "He who lives by the sword, dies by the sword." (Matt26:52) But where does God fit into all this? God says that Heis our Protector. We are to "Fear Not!" Do we trustGod for our safety, leaving our lives in His hands? Ordo we not trust that He is watching after us? If wehave a gun in our hands, what does that leave for Godto do? Some would answer, "God's job is to help usshoot straight so we can kill the one who is attackingus."But that's not true. The Bible tells us to, "LOVE your enemies (NOT kill them). Do GOOD to thosewho hate you. PRAY for those that despitefully useyou." (Matt 5:44) We are to "Love our neighbor as ourself" (Matt 19:19) and that includes NOT taking his life. If we are not under God's protection, we are under thecontrol of the Adversary. There is NO in-between. As soon as we take over our OWN protection, we havetaken our protection OUT of the LORD'S hands and putit in OUR OWN hands. We are trusting in ourselves, weare trusting in MAN - and NOT in YHWH! The Bible tells us clearly that, "He who lives by the sword, dies by the sword." (Matt26:52) We are telling God that we do not think He is capableof protecting us - or that if He is going to allowsomething bad to happen to us, we prefer to run ourown life, rather than having Him run it for us. Wewill not accept whatever unpleasantness He may allowus to undergo. At that moment, we are NO LONGER under the protectionof the Lord, who loves us and always knows what isbest for us. Instead, we are under Satan's control, under thecontrol of the most wicked being in the universe, onewho hates us and wants us dead! Self-Defense means that we will kill someone elsebefore he or she kills us or our family. Self-Defense means that we are willing to KILL inorder to "stop the KILLING!" But does that EVER work? The Judeans and Arabs have been killing each other forthousands of years, and the killing NEVER stops. If "killing - to stop the killing" works, then howabout a pre-emptive strike at someone you think mightbe coming after you, as the U.S. did against Iraq? Isthat the next step in personal Self-Defense? ThePre-emptive strike against Iraq was endorsed by thevast majority of Christians, so why not a personalPre-emptive strike against our personal enemies? What is the difference? Messiah came to show that the ONLY way to stop thekilling is to LOVE our enemies! That's what He showedat the crucifixion. That's why He said, "Father,forgive them. They don't understand what they aredoing." The Bible tells us that, "God is Love" - and "Love NEVER fails." (1John 4:8; 1Cor 13:8) If "LOVE" is the right way to respond to our enemies,then His way is right! If "KILLING our enemy before he kills us," is the |