|
Online Truth
|
Does Scripture Support the Concept of Self-Defense? Is Self-Defense a Right and a Duty? Is It YHWH’sDuty—Or Is It Man’s Responsibility?? Does YHWH Approveof "Christians" Protecting Themselvesand Their Families with Weapons?The majority of Christians believe that the Scripturesapprove of Self-Defense to defend one's own life, orat least the lives of one's family. Many have carriedthis farther and are now insisting it is well within“Christianity” to enter the national military and goto war to defend one’s country. With this philosophyprofessing “Christians” in one country go to war andkill other “professing Christians” who are fulfillingtheir “Christian” responsibility of protecting theircountry, and, by extension, their mates and families.Proponents often point to an incident in South Africa,where attackers charged into a church service oneSunday and began shooting and hurling grenades. Thehero of the story, a heat-packing "Christian,"returned fire with his .38 caliber pistol, killing orwounding a number of the attackers.Enthusiasts of this story look at it partly withsatisfaction that some of the attackers were "takenout" and partly with disappointment that moreworshippers were not carrying guns so more could havebeen "saved." They do not mean "saved by grace throughfaith" but by a good old-fashioned shoot-out betweenbelievers and nonbelievers.Some Christians even go so far as to declare the Scripturesa "book of war." They gleefully point to YHWH'sinstructions to the nation of Israel to destroy theidolatrous Canaanites (Numbers 33:50-53, 55), but failto recognize YHWH's original promise to Israel that Hewould drive out the inhabitants of the land if Israelwould obey Him (Exodus 23:20-30). They also point tothe commands in the Tanakh to kill lawbreakerswithin the church-state of Israel.Their basic premise is that Christians are perfectlyjustified in killing in self-defense or inanticipation of a crime. They claim society in generalwould be much safer if we had a more fully armedcitizenry. Statistics do indicate this: In a secularnation like the United States, society will be saferwith an effective deterrent against violent crime,something the government has not been and may not beable to provide without stripping citizens of manycivil liberties. The question then becomes, is this the teaching putforth in the Holy Scriptures?The question for Nazarenes--true disiples to ponder is this: Eventhough we benefit from living in a society where gunownership is a constitutional right, are we everjustified in intentionally killing another humanbeing? The sixth commandment is very clear: "You shallnot murder" (Exodus 20:13). However, what about thisseemingly gray area of killing someone to protect ourlife or property or that of the empirical self(family, church, neighbors, etc.)? So let us examine some of the arguments given by the“Christian” proponents of Self-Defense a little moreclosely. The following are the texts they often use tosupport these views: "And if anyone does not provide for his own, andespecially for those of his own household, he hasdenied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever." 1Timothy 5:8 "If a thief be found breaking in, and be smitten thathe die, there shall no blood be shed for him." Exodus22:2 "A righteous man who falters before the wicked is as amurky spring and a polluted well." Proverbs 25:26 "And I looked and rose up, and said unto the nobles,and to the rulers, and to the rest of the people, "Benot afraid of them: remember the Lord, who is greatand awesome, and fight for your brethren, your sons,and your daughters, your wives, and your houses."Nehemiah 4:14 "Then He (Yahshua) said unto them (Hisdisciples), "But now, he that has a purse, let himtake it, and likewise his bag (containing his money):and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment,and buy one. . . and they (the disciples) said, "Master,behold here are two swords.' And He (Yahshua) said untothem, "It is enough.' " Luke 22:36,38. YHWH, Himself, through Moshe, gave the followinglaw: "If men fight, and hurt a pregnant woman, so that shegives birth prematurely, he shall surely be punished,according as the woman's husband will lay upon him;and he shall pay as the judges determine. "If any harm follows, then you shall give life forlife, an eye for an eye, tooth for tooth, hand forhand, foot for foot, burning for burning, wound forwound, stripe for stripe." Exodus 21: 22-25 (Though itmust be acknowledged that this was the instructiongiven to those in the position to administerjudgment—not offended individuals themselves.) The sixth commandment says, “You do not murder:" (Exodus 20:13). Since the word "kill" used here (in other translations) in theis more accurately translated "murder,"(Thou shalt not murder), Christians, including manyChristian scholars, conclude that this commandmentdemands that there be pre-meditation and motive beforethe act of killing can be designated as "murder."Thus, it is argued, Self-Defense is EXCLUDED from thesixth commandment. Therefore, Self-Defense, it isbelieved, because of the evidence given in the othertexts listed above, is approved by YHWH. The beliefs of pacifists, it is said, do not stand upto the harsh reality of our fallen world, nor canpacifism be reconciled to the clear teachings ofScripture, according to those that promoteSelf-Defense as approved by YHWH. They quote thefollowing text to support their views: "There is a way that seems right to a man, but the endthereof is death." Proverbs 14:12 Larry Pratt, the President of Gun Owners of America,in his article, "The Biblical Principles of GunControl," apparently believes there is no problemwhatsoever for Christians to be involved inself-defense and the protection of their families. In Charl Van Wyk's book, "Shooting Back: The Right andDuty of Self-Defense," the author states: What does the Bible say about gun control? "The underlying argument for gun control seems to bethat the availability of guns causes crime. Byextension, the availability of any weapon would haveto be viewed as a cause of crime. What does the Biblesay about such a view? . . . God's [YHWH's] response (to Cain'smurder of his brother Abel) was not to ban rocks orknives, or whatever, but to banish the murderer." "Did Christ [Messiah] teach pacifism?" "Many people, Christians included, assume that Christ [Messiah]taught pacifism. They recite Matthew 5:38-39 for theirproof. In this verse Christ said: "You have heard that it was said, an eye for an eyeand a tooth for a tooth. But I tell you not to resistan evil person. But whoever slaps you on your rightcheek, turn the other to him also." The author, Charl Van Wyk, concludes that Messiah wasspeaking to the Pharisees only, the religious leadersof the day, and Messiah's message was, they say: "there is a clear distinction between the duties ofthe civil magistrate (the government) and the dutiesof an individual. Namely, God [YHWH]had delegated to thecivil magistrate the administration of justice (but)individuals have the responsibility of protectingtheir lives from attackers. . . Both the Old and NewTestament teach individual Self-Defense, even if itmeans taking the assailant's life in certaincircumstances," according to author Charl Van Wyk. Mr. Van Wyk continues: "Resisting an attack is not to be confused with takingvengeance, which is the exclusive domain of God(Romans 12:19). This has been delegated to the civilmagistrate, who, as we read in Romans 13:4,
Rom 13:4 for it is a servant of Elohim to you for good. But if you do evil, be afraid, for it does not bear the sword in vain. For it is a servant of Elohim, a revenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil. "Private vengeance means one would stalk down acriminal after one's life is no longer in danger asopposed to defending oneself during an attack. It isthis very point that has been confused by Christianpacifists who would take the passage in the Sermon onthe Mount about turning the other cheek (whichprohibits private vengeance) into a command to falterbefore the wicked. "Let us consider also, that the Sixth Commandmenttells us: "Thou shalt not murder.' In the chaptersfollowing, God [YHWH] gave to Moses many of the situationsthat require a death penalty. God [YHWH]clearly has not toldus never to kill. He has told us not to murder, whichmeans we are not to take an innocent life." (ShootingBack, by Charl Van Wyk, pgs 72,72.) Author, Charl Van Wyk, gives his explanation regardingOur Messiah's order for Peter to "put your swordaway," in John 18:10-11. Mr. Van Wyk believes that OurMessiah did NOT mean, "get rid of it forever". "That would have contradicted what He had told thedisciples only hours before. Peter's sword was toprotect his own mortal life from danger. His sword wasNOT needed to protect the Creator of the Universe andthe King of kings." (ibid. pg 75) says Mr. Van Wyk. Mr. Van Wyk concludes: "In the light of all we have seen the Scriptures teachto this point, can we argue that if we were able tosave another's life by shooting an attacker with ourfirearm—that we should "turn the other cheek' instead?The Bible speaks of no such right. It only speaks ofour responsibilities in the face of an attack—asindividual creatures made by God, as householders oras neighbours" . . . "For those who think that God treated Israeldifferently from the way He will treat us today,please consider what God told the prophet Malachi:"For I am the Lord, I do NOT change. . .' Malachi3:6." (ibid. pgs 76,77,83)Pacifism or Faith?Does it take more strength to abide by God's law andsuffer the consequences from man or to give in andlash out like the rest of mankind? Others argue thatwe have to "do our part" in taking care of ourproperty and ourselves. But where does God ever tellus that "our part" includes sinning?What it really boils down to is what a person's faithis in: God or self. Do we trust God to shield usaccording to His will after we understand the morallimits He has set on our actions?Our Creator has called us to a personal relationshipwith Him, and our trust in His nature and faithfulnesswill determine our responses and actions. A livingfaith goes far beyond lip service and demonstrateswhat we truly believe. If God is real to us, and if Heis sovereign in our lives, we will conduct ourselvesaccording to His law—even when threatened—because webelieve in His ability to accomplish His purpose andbring us into His Kingdom.Protection According to God's WillThe rewards and benefits of the Mosiac Covenant werelargely centered on physical health, material wealth,and national greatness, while its purpose was toprepare the nation for the Messiah's first coming(Galatians 3:19, 24). Salvation was available and wasattained by many as attested to in Hebrews 11. Butbecause of this emphasis on the physical, manyscriptures in the Tanach demonstrate God's intent toshield and protect Israel if they would obey. Theycould depend on their national and individualprotection if they adhered to God's Word. If theyremained faithful to the covenant, God would protectthem—it was a sure thing!We have to look at the subject of YHWH's protectionthrough the lens of His purpose. The intent of the newor renewed covenant is to develop a personalrelationship with YHWH, leading to eternal life andgodly character—and write His laws upon our hearts. Heis willing to do whatever it takes to bring us to thepoint He desires. Thus, He will sometimes remove Hisprotection when it serves His purpose.Even faithful Christians may have their housesburglarized, their cars stolen, or their propertyvandalized. They may be the victims of physical orsexual assault. They may be persecuted and evenmartyred. While some may be the recipients of violenceas a natural consequence of their actions, others willreceive it more or less undeserved, just as Messiahdid.YHWH might allow a man to suffer violence to see howHis creative work is coming along, as a potter teststo discern the quality of his clay and the design ofhis vessel. He might remove a portion of His hedge,not necessarily to punish us, but to instruct us whennothing else will get through.Under the covenant, God does not promise us completeprotection (Matthew 5:11-12, 44; 10:23; John 15:20;16:33; I Thessalonians 3:4; II Timothy 3:12; IICorinthians 11:23-28). However, we are assured that,if we fall victim to violence, it is either because ofour actions (Galatians 6:7) or because He is workingsomething out that we may not discern at the time. Ifwe are called by Him, and if we reciprocate by lovingHim, we have His sure promise that all things willwork together for good (Romans 8:28). Let us now closely examine the arguments ofself-defense proponents.The FIRST question we must ask is, "Why did Messiahcome to earth?" 1. Certainly, He came to save sinners (John 1:29) “Thenext day John sees Jesus coming to him and says,Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of theworld!” but, 2. He also came to reveal the character of The Father(Heb 1:1-4) “God, who at many times and in many waysspoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, hasin these last days spoken to us by His Son, whom Hehas appointed heir of all things, by whom also He madethe worlds, who being the shining splendor of Hisglory, and the express image of His essence, andupholding all things by the word of His power, throughHimself cleansing of our sins, He sat down on theright of the Majesty on high, being made so muchbetter than the angels, as He has by inheritanceobtained a more excellent name than they.” and 3. to be an Example for us to follow (Luke 9:23) “AndHe said to all, If anyone desires to come after Me,let him deny himself and take up his cross daily andfollow Me.” By the time Yahshua came to earth, the leaders of themost religious group on earth, those who had been"Chosen" by God to exhibit the character of God and topreach the Good News of God to all of the surroundingnations of unbelievers, had so perverted and distortedthe Word of God they had been given, turning it awayfrom a focus on God to a focus on themselves as"Special" above all men, that it was necessary for Godto come to earth in the form of man, Jesus (Yahshua),to reveal the exact and complete character of God, toshow that God was vastly different from what menbelieved about Him. But even the religious leaders were in such darkness,they did not recognize Yahshua as God (YHWH). Theywere looking for the Messiah to come in the image of"man," THEIR image of "man" - an earthly king whowould destroy their earthly enemies, the Romans, andset up the Judeans as the rulers over all othernations, an earthly kingdom, ruled by force by a"Messiah.” When Messiah refused to do this, when He refused todestroy Israel's enemies, when He refused to exhibitthe emotions of vengeance as humanity does, theJudeans refused to accept Him as their Messiah. In fact, their hearts were so severely darkened, thatthey also felt justified in killing those THEY decidedwere God's enemies. By worshiping a "killer" God, theybecame like the one they beheld, they became like theone they worshiped. (2 Cor 3:18) Therefore, in theirobsession against One who claimed to be God, theymurdered Jesus - they murdered God!Was/Is Jesus fully God - or just a partialrepresentation of God?Let's examine the texts: A)
Isaiah 7:14 Isa 7:14 “Therefore יהוה Himself gives you a sign: Look, the maiden conceives and gives birth to a Son, and shall call His Name Immanu’ĕl. B) "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with Elohim, and the Word was Elohim. "
And the Word became flesh and pitched His tent among us . . ." John 1:1, 14 C)
|