Online Truth


You are the light of the world.  A city that is set on a hill cannot be hidden.  Nor do they light a lamp and put it under a basket, but on a lamp stand, and it gives light to all in the house.  Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works and glorify your Father in heaven.  Matthew 5:14-16

 

 
 Does Scripture Support the Concept of Self-Defense?
 
Is Self-Defense a Right and a Duty?  Is It YHWH’s
Duty—Or Is It Man’s Responsibility??  Does YHWH Approve
of "Christians" Protecting Themselves
and Their Families with Weapons?
 
The majority of Christians believe that the Scriptures
approve of Self-Defense to defend one's own life, or
at least the lives of one's family.  Many have carried
this farther and are now insisting it is well within
“Christianity” to enter the national military and go
to war to defend one’s country.  With this philosophy
professing “Christians” in one country go to war and
kill other “professing Christians” who are fulfilling
their “Christian” responsibility of protecting their
country, and, by extension, their mates and families.
Proponents often point to an incident in South Africa,
where attackers charged into a church service one
Sunday and began shooting and hurling grenades. The
hero of the story, a heat-packing "Christian,"
returned fire with his .38 caliber pistol, killing or
wounding a number of the attackers.
Enthusiasts of this story look at it partly with
satisfaction that some of the attackers were "taken
out" and partly with disappointment that more
worshippers were not carrying guns so more could have
been "saved." They do not mean "saved by grace through
faith" but by a good old-fashioned shoot-out between
believers and nonbelievers.
Some Christians even go so far as to declare the Scriptures
a "book of war." They gleefully point to YHWH's
instructions to the nation of Israel to destroy the
idolatrous Canaanites (Numbers 33:50-53, 55), but fail
to recognize YHWH's original promise to Israel that He
would drive out the inhabitants of the land if Israel
would obey Him (Exodus 23:20-30). They also point to
the commands in the Tanakh to kill lawbreakers
within the church-state of Israel.
Their basic premise is that Christians are perfectly
justified in killing in self-defense or in
anticipation of a crime. They claim society in general
would be much safer if we had a more fully armed
citizenry. Statistics do indicate this: In a secular
nation like the United States, society will be safer
with an effective deterrent against violent crime,
something the government has not been and may not be
able to provide without stripping citizens of many
civil liberties. 
The question then becomes, is this the teaching put
forth in the Holy Scriptures?
The question for Nazarenes--true disiples to ponder is this: Even
though we benefit from living in a society where gun
ownership is a constitutional right, are we ever
justified in intentionally killing another human
being? The sixth commandment is very clear: "You shall
not murder" (Exodus 20:13). However, what about this
seemingly gray area of killing someone to protect our
life or property or that of the empirical self
(family, church, neighbors, etc.)?
 
So let us examine some of the arguments given by the
“Christian” proponents of Self-Defense a little more
closely. The following are the texts they often use to
support these views:
 
"And if anyone does not provide for his own, and
especially for those of his own household, he has
denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever." 1
Timothy 5:8
 
"If a thief be found breaking in, and be smitten that
he die, there shall no blood be shed for him." Exodus
22:2
 
"A righteous man who falters before the wicked is as a
murky spring and a polluted well." Proverbs 25:26
 
"And I looked and rose up, and said unto the nobles,
and to the rulers, and to the rest of the people, "Be
not afraid of them: remember the Lord, who is great
and awesome, and fight for your brethren, your sons,
and your daughters, your wives, and your houses."
Nehemiah 4:14
 
"Then He (Yahshua) said unto them (His
disciples), "But now, he that has a purse, let him
take it, and likewise his bag (containing his money):
and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment,
and buy one. . . and they (the disciples) said, "Master,
behold here are two swords.' And He (Yahshua) said unto
them, "It is enough.' " Luke 22:36,38.
 
YHWH, Himself, through Moshe, gave the following
law:
 
"If men fight, and hurt a pregnant woman, so that she
gives birth prematurely, he shall surely be punished,
according as the woman's husband will lay upon him;
and he shall pay as the judges determine.
 
"If any harm follows, then you shall give life for
life, an eye for an eye, tooth for tooth, hand for
hand, foot for foot, burning for burning, wound for
wound, stripe for stripe." Exodus 21: 22-25 (Though it
must be acknowledged that this was the instruction
given to those in the position to administer
judgment—not offended individuals themselves.)
 
The sixth commandment says, “You do not murder:"
(Exodus 20:13). Since the word "kill" used here (in other translations) in the
is more accurately translated "murder,"
(Thou shalt not murder), Christians, including many
Christian scholars, conclude that this commandment
demands that there be pre-meditation and motive before
the act of killing can be designated as "murder."
Thus, it is argued, Self-Defense is EXCLUDED from the
sixth commandment. Therefore, Self-Defense, it is
believed, because of the evidence given in the other
texts listed above, is approved by YHWH. 
 
The beliefs of pacifists, it is said, do not stand up
to the harsh reality of our fallen world, nor can
pacifism be reconciled to the clear teachings of
Scripture, according to those that promote
Self-Defense as approved by YHWH. They quote the
following text to support their views:
 
"There is a way that seems right to a man, but the end
thereof is death." Proverbs 14:12
 
Larry Pratt, the President of Gun Owners of America,
in his article, "The Biblical Principles of Gun
Control," apparently believes there is no problem
whatsoever for Christians to be involved in
self-defense and the protection of their families.
 
In Charl Van Wyk's book, "Shooting Back: The Right and
Duty of Self-Defense," the author states:
 
What does the Bible say about gun control?
 
"The underlying argument for gun control seems to be
that the availability of guns causes crime. By
extension, the availability of any weapon would have
to be viewed as a cause of crime. What does the Bible
say about such a view? . . . God's [YHWH's] response (to Cain's
murder of his brother Abel) was not to ban rocks or
knives, or whatever, but to banish the murderer."
 
"Did Christ [Messiah] teach pacifism?"
 
"Many people, Christians included, assume that Christ [Messiah]
taught pacifism. They recite Matthew 5:38-39 for their
proof. In this verse Christ said: 
 
"You have heard that it was said, an eye for an eye
and a tooth for a tooth. But I tell you not to resist
an evil person. But whoever slaps you on your right
cheek, turn the other to him also."
 
The author, Charl Van Wyk, concludes that Messiah was
speaking to the Pharisees only, the religious leaders
of the day, and Messiah's message was, they say: 
 
"there is a clear distinction between the duties of
the civil magistrate (the government) and the duties
of an individual. Namely, God [YHWH]had delegated to the
civil magistrate the administration of justice (but)
individuals have the responsibility of protecting
their lives from attackers. . . Both the Old and New
Testament teach individual Self-Defense, even if it
means taking the assailant's life in certain
circumstances," according to author Charl Van Wyk.
 
Mr. Van Wyk continues:
 
"Resisting an attack is not to be confused with taking
vengeance, which is the exclusive domain of God
(Romans 12:19). This has been delegated to the civil
magistrate, who, as we read in Romans 13:4, 

Rom 13:4 for it is a servant of Elohim to you for good. But if you do evil, be afraid, for it does not bear the sword in vain. For it is a servant of Elohim, a revenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil.

 
"Private vengeance means one would stalk down a
criminal after one's life is no longer in danger as
opposed to defending oneself during an attack. It is
this very point that has been confused by Christian
pacifists who would take the passage in the Sermon on
the Mount about turning the other cheek (which
prohibits private vengeance) into a command to falter
before the wicked.
 
"Let us consider also, that the Sixth Commandment
tells us: "Thou shalt not murder.' In the chapters
following, God [YHWH] gave to Moses many of the situations
that require a death penalty. God [YHWH]clearly has not told
us never to kill. He has told us not to murder, which
means we are not to take an innocent life." (Shooting
Back, by Charl Van Wyk, pgs 72,72.)
 
Author, Charl Van Wyk, gives his explanation regarding
Our Messiah's order for Peter to "put your sword
away," in John 18:10-11. Mr. Van Wyk believes that Our
Messiah did NOT mean, "get rid of it forever". 
 
"That would have contradicted what He had told the
disciples only hours before. Peter's sword was to
protect his own mortal life from danger. His sword was
NOT needed to protect the Creator of the Universe and
the King of kings." (ibid. pg 75) says Mr. Van Wyk. 
 
Mr. Van Wyk concludes:
 
"In the light of all we have seen the Scriptures teach
to this point, can we argue that if we were able to
save another's life by shooting an attacker with our
firearm—that we should "turn the other cheek' instead?
The Bible speaks of no such right. It only speaks of
our responsibilities in the face of an attack—as
individual creatures made by God, as householders or
as neighbours" . . .
 
"For those who think that God treated Israel
differently from the way He will treat us today,
please consider what God told the prophet Malachi:
"For I am the Lord, I do NOT change. . .' Malachi
3:6." (ibid. pgs 76,77,83)
Pacifism or Faith?
Does it take more strength to abide by God's law and
suffer the consequences from man or to give in and
lash out like the rest of mankind? Others argue that
we have to "do our part" in taking care of our
property and ourselves. But where does God ever tell
us that "our part" includes sinning?
What it really boils down to is what a person's faith
is in: God or self. Do we trust God to shield us
according to His will after we understand the moral
limits He has set on our actions?
Our Creator has called us to a personal relationship
with Him, and our trust in His nature and faithfulness
will determine our responses and actions. A living
faith goes far beyond lip service and demonstrates
what we truly believe. If God is real to us, and if He
is sovereign in our lives, we will conduct ourselves
according to His law—even when threatened—because we
believe in His ability to accomplish His purpose and
bring us into His Kingdom.
Protection According to God's Will
The rewards and benefits of the Mosiac Covenant were
largely centered on physical health, material wealth,
and national greatness, while its purpose was to
prepare the nation for the Messiah's first coming
(Galatians 3:19, 24). Salvation was available and was
attained by many as attested to in Hebrews 11.  But
because of this emphasis on the physical, many
scriptures in the Tanach demonstrate God's intent to
shield and protect Israel if they would obey. They
could depend on their national and individual
protection if they adhered to God's Word. If they
remained faithful to the covenant, God would protect
them—it was a sure thing!
We have to look at the subject of YHWH's protection
through the lens of His purpose. The intent of the new
or renewed covenant is to develop a personal
relationship with YHWH, leading to eternal life and
godly character—and write His laws upon our hearts. He
is willing to do whatever it takes to bring us to the
point He desires. Thus, He will sometimes remove His
protection when it serves His purpose.
Even faithful Christians may have their houses
burglarized, their cars stolen, or their property
vandalized. They may be the victims of physical or
sexual assault. They may be persecuted and even
martyred. While some may be the recipients of violence
as a natural consequence of their actions, others will
receive it more or less undeserved, just as Messiah
did.
YHWH might allow a man to suffer violence to see how
His creative work is coming along, as a potter tests
to discern the quality of his clay and the design of
his vessel. He might remove a portion of His hedge,
not necessarily to punish us, but to instruct us when
nothing else will get through.
Under the covenant, God does not promise us complete
protection (Matthew 5:11-12, 44; 10:23; John 15:20;
16:33; I Thessalonians 3:4; II Timothy 3:12; II
Corinthians 11:23-28). However, we are assured that,
if we fall victim to violence, it is either because of
our actions (Galatians 6:7) or because He is working
something out that we may not discern at the time. If
we are called by Him, and if we reciprocate by loving
Him, we have His sure promise that all things will
work together for good (Romans 8:28).
 
Let us now closely examine the arguments of
self-defense proponents.
The FIRST question we must ask is, "Why did Messiah
come to earth?" 
 
1. Certainly, He came to save sinners (John 1:29) “The
next day John sees Jesus coming to him and says,
Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the
world!”
 but, 
 
2. He also came to reveal the character of The Father
(Heb 1:1-4) “God, who at many times and in many ways
spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, has
in these last days spoken to us by His Son, whom He
has appointed heir of all things, by whom also He made
the worlds, who being the shining splendor of His
glory, and the express image of His essence, and
upholding all things by the word of His power, through
Himself cleansing of our sins, He sat down on the
right of the Majesty on high, being made so much
better than the angels, as He has by inheritance
obtained a more excellent name than they.”
 
and
 
3. to be an Example for us to follow (Luke 9:23) “And
He said to all, If anyone desires to come after Me,
let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and
follow Me.”
 
By the time Yahshua came to earth, the leaders of the
most religious group on earth, those who had been
"Chosen" by God to exhibit the character of God and to
preach the Good News of God to all of the surrounding
nations of unbelievers, had so perverted and distorted
the Word of God they had been given, turning it away
from a focus on God to a focus on themselves as
"Special" above all men, that it was necessary for God
to come to earth in the form of man, Jesus (Yahshua),
to reveal the exact and complete character of God, to
show that God was vastly different from what men
believed about Him.
 
But even the religious leaders were in such darkness,
they did not recognize Yahshua as God (YHWH). They
were looking for the Messiah to come in the image of
"man," THEIR image of "man" - an earthly king who
would destroy their earthly enemies, the Romans, and
set up the Judeans as the rulers over all other
nations, an earthly kingdom, ruled by force by a
"Messiah.”
 
When Messiah refused to do this, when He refused to
destroy Israel's enemies, when He refused to exhibit
the emotions of vengeance as humanity does, the
Judeans refused to accept Him as their Messiah. 
 
In fact, their hearts were so severely darkened, that
they also felt justified in killing those THEY decided
were God's enemies. By worshiping a "killer" God, they
became like the one they beheld, they became like the
one they worshiped. (2 Cor 3:18) Therefore, in their
obsession against One who claimed to be God, they
murdered Jesus - they murdered God!
Was/Is Jesus fully God - or just a partial
representation of God?
 
Let's examine the texts:
 
 
A) 

Mat 1:21 “And she shall give birth to a Son, and you shall call His Name יהושע  for He shall save His people from their sins.”

Mat 1:22 And all this came to be in order to fill what was spoken by יהוה  through the prophet, saying,

Mat 1:23 “See, a maiden shall conceive, and she shall give birth to a Son, and they shall call His Name Immanu’ĕl,” which translated, means, “Ěl with us.”

 

 Isaiah 7:14

Isa 7:14 “Therefore יהוה  Himself gives you a sign: Look, the maiden conceives and gives birth to a Son, and shall call His Name Immanu’ĕl.

  
B) "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with Elohim, and the Word was Elohim. 
 
"

And the Word became flesh and pitched His tent among us. . ." John 1:1, 14

 
C)